2005 and 2006: Flip-Flop Years
We have seen academic studies that verify the bias towards underdogs in the NFL (as well as in other major sports). The past two seasons have seen some extremes in the NFL. 2005 saw underdogs perform poorly (favorites covered at more than a 57% rate!). And then 2006 saw the underdogs come back with a vengeance, covering the point spread almost 56% of the time.
Here is a table of NFL underdog performance over the past few years.
Table 1: NFL Underdogs vs. Point Spread
Betting Against the Public in the NFL
Over the past 4 seasons, betting on dogs would have resulted in a 51.3% winning percentage. If you Bet Against the Public (in the NFL, most of these plays would be on the dog, at the 75% level), you would have hit 55.4% over the past three years (see Table 2, below). Results are fairly consistent each year, with Betting Against the Public adding about 4% value per year.
This shows that Betting Against the Public can be beneficial to your handicapping. As you can see, the results can jump around from season to season. This is partly due to the relatively low number of games during the NFL Season. It’s also the nature of any investment: there is both risk AND return.
Table 2: Benefit of Betting Against Public (vs. Spread) at 75% Level
|All Dogs||Dogs, Bet Against Public|
We do not guarantee that the trends and biases we’ve found will continue to exist. It is impossible to predict the future. Any serious academic research in the field of “market efficiencies” recognizes that inefficiencies may disappear or fade over time. Once inefficiencies are discovered, it is only a matter of time before the market corrects itself. We do not guarantee our data is error-free. However, we’ve tried our best to make sure every score is accurate.