|
SportsInsights.com Article -- MLB and Betting
Against the Public (Includes 2003-09 Seasons) April 2010
SportsInsights'
New Book on Sports Investing
In conjunction
with this year's Major League Baseball "Bet Against the
Public" update, SportsInsights is pleased to announce the
publication of its new book,
Sports Investing - Profiting from
Point Spreads. The book applies SportsInsights' philosophy
of "Finding Value in the Sports Marketplace"
and solidifies SportsInsights' standing as one of the
leaders within the sports information industry.
MLB
Update
SportsInsights
is also happy to update our research on baseball statistics
and the recent performance of "Betting Against the Public."
Contrarian "sports investing" worked
particularly well in Major League Baseball last season. With
more than 16,000 data points over seven seasons, baseball continues
to show impressive
statistical results. In addition, with many sports
winding down just as baseball is starting up, baseball will soon
be the "only game in town" for some sports investors. But
what a game it is: with a 162 game season and 30 teams, there
are plenty of profit opportunities! The information on this site is for entertainment and
educational purposes only. Use of this information in violation
of any federal, state, or local laws is prohibited.
MLB
Database (2003-2009 Seasons)
SportsInsights
(SIs) has collected betting data for every major U.S. sport
since the 2003. We collect the opening and closing lines
(and "line movement," for various sportsbooks) as well
as final scores -- and perhaps most importantly, SIs'
proprietary "betting percentages."
Our research
team also "cleans" our data with various systematic techniques
-- as well as "by hand" -- to ensure our historical data is useful for
our research articles and our Members. SI's
historical database for each sport is an important part of
our research and value-added for our Members. It is
the backbone for our contrarian sports investing methods
and you can't find this kind of data and information anywhere
else!
SportsInsights'
database for MLB now includes more than 16,000 games over the past
seven seasons. For the purposes of this article, we include
the playoffs, but exclude spring training. Similar to hockey, baseball is a "moneyline" sport, so that we
emphasize "units
won" (and not winning percentage).
Betting
Against the Public
Similar to last
year, we present results for "Betting Against the Public"
at different
thresholds of betting percentage AND for home teams and visiting
teams.
Table 1:
MLB and Betting Against the Public (2003-2009 Seasons)
| Betting % |
Home |
Visitor |
Total |
| 50 |
+92 units |
-110 units |
-18 units |
| 40 |
+71 |
-43 |
+28 |
| 30 |
+52 |
+8 |
+60 |
| 25 |
+50 |
-34 |
+16 |
| 20 |
+12 |
+17 |
+29 |
| 15 |
+17 |
-7 |
+10 |
Using the
Table
-
In addition
to overall "Bet Against" results, we have broken
down how Betting Against the Public
works for Home teams or a Visitors.
-
For
example, if a Home team has less than 30%
of the public betting on
them (Visitor has more than 70% of the public), this scenario resulted in
+52 units.
-
On the
other hand, Visitors with less than 30% of the bets (more
than 70% of bets on
Home team), resulted in +8 units.
-
Some
members may try using Home teams at the 25%
level and Visiting teams at the 20%
level.
Contrarian
Investing, Odds and Psychology
Similar to
all major sports SportsInsights.com studies, there is
"value" in selecting underdogs. In moneyline sports such as baseball and hockey, historical
data shows that picking underdogs -- that pay out more than
you risk -- is the best way to earn profits when investing
in the sports marketplace. This may result in winning
only 40%-50% of your selections, but the long odds means
you'll have positive Units Won.
Why does
this work? Psychologically, contrarian sports
investing makes a lot of sense. Most casual bettors
like to watch a game and say that they "picked the
winner." This is why many fan favorites or
championship-caliber teams are over-valued and do poorly
"against the spread." Most sports fans like
to bet on heavily-favored teams like the Yankees or Red Sox
and happily watch their team win 55% or 60% of the
time. However, they forget that they might be laying
-200 moneyline odds (or betting $200 to win $100).
Many of these fans who lay heavy odds (or in other sports,
lay a lot of points) shrug their shoulders if they see
themselves losing money because they know that
their team seems to be winning around 60% of the time (even
as their bankrolls dwindle). In the long-run, if
you continue to lay heavy (-200) odds and win even 60% of
the time, you will lose your hard-earned cash. On
the other hand, SportsInsights' proprietary betting percentages
can help you see which teams the Public loves too much. We
can then "bet against" these over-valued teams and
seek out contrarian value. On average, SIs'
methods such as "betting against the Public" or
"smart money methods" have our Members betting on
undervalued underdogs. "Sharp bettors" and our
Members often find value on underdogs that look "ugly" -- but with
moneyline odds and point spreads -- can be profitable over the
long-run.
Some
Notes
-
The
contrarian "30% bet against level" continues to be the largest profit-maker in terms of
units won. The "30% level" also results in
more consistency between Home and
Visitor plays; that is, both Home and Visitor selections
have been positive over the entire dataset.
-
Home teams
continue to be undervalued in major
league baseball when "betting against the
Public."
-
Higher or
lower "Betting Percentage" thresholds will increase or
decrease the number of plays respectively.
-
MLB Square
Plays have been solidly profitable the past two years, earning +40
units in 2008, and +39 units in 2009.
Disclaimer We do not guarantee that the trends and biases we’ve found will
continue to exist. It is impossible to predict the future. Any
serious academic research in the field of “market efficiencies”
recognizes that inefficiencies may disappear over time. Once
inefficiencies are discovered, it is only a matter of time
before the market corrects itself. We do not guarantee our data
is error-free. However, we’ve tried our best to make sure every
score and percentage is correct.
|