| SportsInsights.com Article
SportsInsights.com Article: The "New NHL" & Betting Against the Public (2005-2006
Season)
The new NHL
Season is set to start but is almost lost in the excitement of
the new football season -- and the baseball playoffs. Some
sports investors, however, look forward to the NHL and NBA
Seasons as "more abundant" profit opportunities. The
hockey and basketball regular seasons generate many more games
than football. SO -- let's see how SportsInsight's
approach of
Betting Against the Public fares in the NHL.
Note that the
NHL entered a "New Era" for the 2005-2006 Season, instituting
some major rule changes after the previous year's strike.
Major changes such as overtime and the shootout have eliminated
"ties." Our article reflects these changes and uses only
data from the "New NHL's" 2005-2006 Season. The information
on this site is for entertainment and educational purposes only.
Use of this information in violation of any federal, state, or
local laws is prohibited.
NHL Moneyline Results
Although last
year's rule changes limit our data to the 2005-2006 NHL Season,
this still leaves us with a very reasonable 1500 games.
Sports that primarily use moneylines, such as baseball and
hockey (as opposed to sports like football and basketball, which
use point spreads) often create debates about which strategy is
best. Some bettors like to focus on home dogs.
Others like taking big favorites, figuring they will win most of
the time. Confusion about how moneylines work -- as well
as the public's general tendency to favorites --
has historically created a bias towards betting on underdogs.
Here, we
present the results of betting on the home team at various
moneyline ranges during the 2005-2006 NHL Season.
Table 1 –
NHL 2005-2006 Moneyline Results (Betting on Home Team at Various
Odds)
| Home Team Moneyline |
Units W/L |
ROI |
Win % |
Avg Odds |
Notes |
| -999 to
+999 |
-1.6 |
-0.1% |
57.1% |
-120 |
All
Home Teams |
| -999 to -100 |
+7.7 |
+0.9% |
62.5% |
-158 |
All Home Favorites |
| -999 to -200 |
-8.9 |
-3.8% |
69.4% |
-252 |
Large Home Favorites |
| -200 to -100 |
+16.0 |
2.5% |
59.7% |
-139 |
Smaller Home Favorites |
| +100 to
+999 |
-9.3 |
-3.0% |
41.5% |
+141 |
All
Home Dogs |
| +100 to
+150 |
+3.5 |
2.3% |
47.7% |
+115 |
Small
Home Dogs |
| +150 to
+200 |
-12.1 |
-12.0% |
34.7% |
+156 |
|
| +200 to
+999 |
-2.4 |
-8.8% |
29.6% |
+222 |
Large
Home Dogs |
There is no clear-cut winning strategy based on the chart
above. There might be a bias towards small home favorites.
However, we would emphasize that results are only from one
season and the number of games in some of the "buckets" may be
relatively small.
Betting Against the Public -- NHL
Last year, near mid-season, we took a look at how "Betting
Against the Public" fared in the -170 to +170 (Home odds) range.
We used this range because this is where we had the most data --
and where the data seemed the most "robust." Since this
method worked well, we stayed with this approach and have
updated the results below.
For the entire season, the results continued to earn a
profit and solidified our comfort level of Betting Against the
Public in the NHL and other sports. Results like
this (+40 units, 12% ROI) might be hard to sustain, but we
believe these results highlight two factors:
We hope you
will use this and other
SportsInsights tools to help you invest in the sports
marketplace. Our
Premium and
Premium Pro Members can access even more tools to make the
upcoming NHL, NBA, and College Basketball Seasons -- as well as
current NFL and College Football Seasons -- "profitable
Sports Investing campaigns."
Table 2: NHL and
Betting Against the Public (-170 to +170 Range)
|
Betting % |
Units W/L |
ROI |
Win % |
Avg Odds |
|
50% |
+32.8 |
4.6% |
50.7% |
+111 |
|
45% |
+37.4 |
7.0% |
51.2% |
+114 |
|
40% |
+41.6 |
11.5% |
52.5% |
+116 |
|
35% |
+26.5 |
12.8% |
52.2% |
+120 |
Disclaimer We do not guarantee that the trends and biases we’ve found will
continue to exist. It is impossible to predict the future. Any
serious academic research in the field of “market efficiencies”
recognizes that inefficiencies may disappear over time. Once
inefficiencies are discovered, it is only a matter of time
before the market corrects itself. We do not guarantee our data
is error-free. However, we’ve tried our best to make sure every
score and percentage is correct.
|