SportsInsights.com
Article
Selectivity & Sports Investing
Bettors often
think of how much they will win if they achieve a 60% winning
percentage. It seems easy enough, right? A monkey throwing
darts should be able to hit 50%. With just a little knowledge,
it seems easy enough to hit 52.4%. The gambler thinks, “Heck:
I’m a smart sports fan, I should be able to hit 55%, maybe even
60%.”
However, as with
other zero-sum games (and the sportsbook’s vig makes sports
investing even tougher than zero-sum), only a small percentage
of players are materially successful. It’s nice thinking about
the potential gains – but it’s better to be conservative and
think of the potential risks. Traders often preach,
“Manage the risk, and the profits will take care of themselves.”
In this article,
our goal is to show that if your picks do not have an edge, the
spread below 52.4% will eat up your bankroll faster than
high-priced commissions will churn a stock portfolio. We’ll
quantify the potential churning and losses – and show that you
really need a “real edge” (with a sustainable margin) to
overcome the seemingly small “take” of the sportsbooks. We’ll
show that the vig is deceptive – and can add up to significant
amounts. The information on this site is for entertainment and
educational purposes only. Use of this information in violation
of any federal, state, or local laws is prohibited.
Selectivity
Some of the
members on SportsInsights.com’s forums have the right idea: on
any given day, they limit themselves to the best 3-4 plays.
This way, even if you THINK you have six great plays in a day,
the “3-4 play limit” will limit your risk – and reduce your
exposure to the “take” of the sportsbook. Let’s take a look at
what happens to a sportsbook account if you have no edge (and
hit 50% of your plays), and make an average of three or five
plays a day. Our hypothetical bettor has a $5,000 bankroll and
bets $100 on each play.
Chart 1: Churning of a Sportsbook
Account
($5,000 bankroll, $100 bet size, 50% winning percent)
|
|
3 plays a day |
5 plays a day |
|
Weekly Loss
|
- $95 |
- $159 |
|
Monthly Loss |
- $382 |
- $636 |
|
Quarterly Loss |
- $1,145 |
- $1,909 |
As you can see, betting without an edge can
eat into your bankroll quite rapidly. An account can lose about
-10% in a month, and –30% in a quarter! Being SELECTIVE
will help your bankroll avoid the constant erosion from the
sportsbook’s vig.
What Can You Do?
The chart above is probably a wake-up call
for some. The sportsbook’s “vig” is deceptive: it seems small
but can add up to substantial amounts. What can you, as a
sports investor, do? Here are some ideas that should help
minimize the sportsbook’s “take” and help you “put the wind at
your back.”
Other Uses for these Numbers
Now, for those of you who think this
article is too much “Doom and Gloom” – you can use these numbers
as estimates for the upside as well. That is, 52.4% is the
cutoff for earning profits. The losses we computed are based on
picks based on “no information” (50% winning percentage).
If you have a sustainable edge that is 55%,
you can estimate your winnings with these same charts. If you
believe you can achieve 57.5%, you can double the figures. On
the other hand, if you often “go with your gut” and tend to be
with “Joe Public” – you might actually do worse than 50%.
Chart 2: Potential Sports
Investing Profits
($5,000 bankroll, $100 bet size, 3 bets/day)
|
|
55% Winning Pct |
57.5% Winning Pct |
|
Weekly Gain
|
$95 |
$190 |
|
Monthly Gain |
$382 |
$764 |
|
Quarterly Gain |
$1,145 |
$2,290 |
As usual, it comes down to hard work and a
good system with an edge. SportsInsights.com emphasizes a
systematic, disciplined, and business-like approach to sports
investing. Good luck and visit SportsInsights.com often for
ideas on sports investing.
Disclaimer
We do not
guarantee that the trends and biases we’ve found will continue
to exist. It is impossible to predict the future. Any serious
academic research in the field of “market efficiencies”
recognizes that inefficiencies may disappear over time. Once
inefficiencies are discovered, it is only a matter of time
before the market corrects itself. We do not guarantee our data
is error-free. However, we’ve tried our best to make sure every
score and percentage is correct.
|