|
SportsInsights.com Article -- Springing into the Regular Season
(Spring Training 2010)
by the Team
at SportsInsights.com, with Carlton Chin and Don LaFronz
contributing.
Introduction
Spring training
is in full swing and your team is red hot. Or maybe your
team is stinking. But who cares? It's
"just" spring training, right? Do wins and
losses during spring training mean anything at all? With
the help of Carlton Chin and Don LaFronz, we took a look at how
spring training can potentially be an indication of how teams
might perform during the regular season.
cSports
investing is all about finding value in the sports
marketplace. Data shows that spring training can be a leading
indicator for regular season performance. In fact, some
big surprises are sometimes predicted by spring training
performance. Sports bettors are often looking for
undervalued and overvalued teams -- and spring training can give
them this edge, especially early in the season. The
information on this site is for entertainment and educational
purposes only. Use of this information in violation of any
federal, state, or local laws is prohibited.
Spring
Training Correlation to Regular Season
Lots of players
are trying new things out. Split squads often represent
teams, so can the games be meaningful? Players are just
loosening up. Established teams have nothing to prove
while less-proven teams are looking forward to the freshness and
hope of a new spring. We actually expected little or no
correlation between spring training and regular season
records.
We took a look
at results over the past seven years, or data from 2003-2009, and
found that spring training records are somewhat correlated to
the regular season. The actual statistical correlation is
0.21, but because this correlation statistic means little to
most people, we tried to come up with meaningful ways to present
the results.
Using the best
and worst five teams in spring training going back to 2003, we
looked at how these specific sets of teams performed. Teams
that played well in spring training were three times as likely
to make the playoffs as teams that played poorly (37.1% versus
11.4%). We also show the average winning
percentage during the regular season for the best and
worst-performing spring training teams.
Table
1: Regular Season Performance of Best and Worst Spring Training
Teams (2003-2009)
| |
Playoff Probability |
Average Regular Season
Winning % |
| Top Five Teams in Spring
Training |
37.1% |
.525 |
| Worst Five Teams in Spring
Training |
11.4% |
.482 |
Additional
Notes on Results
-
The results
have been even more striking over the past three season,
with the top five spring training teams playing .545 ball,
with 47% of these teams making the playoffs.
-
Spring
training results can also flag some potential surprises such
as Tampa Bay's 2008 season, where they played .599 ball to
make the playoffs following a .407 regular season in
2007. Tampa Bay had a 2008 spring training winning
percentage of .731!
-
If your
team struggles during spring training, don't worry: even the
worst teams made the playoffs at an 11.4% rate.
Spring training
is not as meaningless as some fans think. Teams can use
spring training as a springboard into the regular season. Teams
may get into the habit of winning or losing. They might gain
confidence - or lose confidence - as the season is set to
start.
Disclaimer We do not guarantee that the trends and biases we’ve found will
continue to exist. It is impossible to predict the future. Any
serious academic research in the field of “market efficiencies”
recognizes that inefficiencies may disappear over time. Once
inefficiencies are discovered, it is only a matter of time
before the market corrects itself. We do not guarantee our data
is error-free. However, we’ve tried our best to make sure every
score and percentage is correct.
Carlton Chin is a fund manager and co-author of
"Who
Will Win the Big Game?" Don LaFronz is a
financial advisor.
|